What is 10.1.1.0 subnet 24?
Here is the information you may want to know if you see 10.1.1.0/24 and wonder what it is.
Six different routes are available:
- A host route is a path that leads to a host. So the route doesn’t lead to a network. Host routes have a prefix length of /32 and a subnet mask of 255.255.255.255.
- A subnet is a segment of a larger network. The subnet mask determines the subnet’s size. A subnet is 10.10.10.0/24 (255.255.255.0).
- A single route that refers to a collection of subnets is referred to as a summary route. If there were subnets with longer masks (like 10.10.10.0/24), then 10.10.0.0/16 (255.255.0.0) would be a summary.
- A major network is any classful network that includes its native mask. Major network 10.0.0.0/8 (255.0.0.0).
- A supernet is a single route that alludes to a significant network group. For instance, the supernets 10.0.0.0/8 and 11.0.0.0/8 are references to 10.0.0.0/7.
- A default route is displayed as 0.0.0.0/0. (0.0.0.0). This path is also referred to as a last resort. This route is used when no other route matches a packet’s destination IP address.
The effective distribution of an IP network in IP address blocks is known as a “subnetwork,” also known as an IP address subnet. Class A Blocks contain 16 million IP addresses and have a “/8” at the end. Class B Blocks have a “/16” at the end and have 65,000 IP addresses. The maximum number of IP addresses supported by Class C Blocks is 254.
Examples of each class are as follows:
- Class A Example – 1.1.1.0/8 – 16 million hosts
- Class B Example – 1.1.1.0/16 – 65,000 hosts
- Class C Example – 1.1.1.0/24 – 254 hosts
A method for allocating IP addresses and for IP routing, this format 10.1.01.0/24 is known as Classless Inter-Domain Routing CIDR representation. In 1993, the Internet Engineering Task Force introduced CIDR to replace the prior classful network addressing scheme. It aimed to slow the expansion of routing tables on routers throughout the Internet and to contribute to a slower rate of IPv4 address exhaustion.) It is, therefore, a bit mask that specifies which part of the IP address can be used for the range.
For instance, out of the total 32 bits in the address field, 24 bits are still usable in your case, 10.1.1.0/24. If you think of an IP address as four parts of 8 bits, you get 255.255.255.255, or in your case, 28.28.28.28. This means that the first three parts of the IP address, or 8 bits, are protected (won’t change), and only the last 8th of the IP will be used as part of the range. Providing you with a range in this format, 10.0.0.1 – 10.0.0.255.
It is conceivable that the 10.0.0.0 IP is kept for your router, network card, or other devices, which explains why it is not present.
Also, the smaller the range number, e.g., 32, 24, 16, 8, the larger the IP range.
The IP range also increases with decreasing range numbers, such as 32, 24, 16, or 8.
Calculate an IPv4 subnet.
Two things are apparent: while all host bits in a network address are zeroes, they are all set in a broadcast address. Your network’s class, from A to E, is determined by its first bits. Most often, A, B, and C are used. A range of IP addresses is acceptable for each class.
The address range for
Class A ranges from 1.0.0.1 to 126.255.255.254. (supports 16 million hosts on each of 127 networks).
Class B ranges from 128.1.0.1 to 191.255.255.254. (65,000 hosts on each of 16,000 networks).
Class C ranges from 192.0.1.1 to 223.255.254.254 (254 hosts on each of 2 million networks).
Class D ranges from 224.0.0.0 to 239.255.255.255 (address range reserved for multicast groups).
Class E ranges from 240.0.0.0 to 254.255.255.254 (reserved for future use, research, and development purposes).
Here are the results:
| Address: | 10.10.1.0 | 00001010.00001010.00000001.00000000 |
| Netmask: | 255.255.255.0 | 11111111.11111111.11111111.00000000 |
| Wildcard: | 0.0.0.255 | 00000000.00000000.00000000.11111111 |
| Network Address: | 10.10.1.0 / 24 | 00001010.00001010.00000001.00000000 |
| Broadcast Address: | 10.10.1.255 | 00001010.00001010.00000001.11111111 |
| First host: | 10.10.1.1 | 00001010.00001010.00000001.00000001 |
| Last host: | 10.10.1.254 | 00001010.00001010.00000001.11111110 |
| Total host count: | 254 |
Having issues when using 10.1.1.0/24
While using 10.1.1.0/24, you might notice sluggish performance. Is there really a significant slowdown in network device discovery (for instance, NFS share discovery in Kodi, printer discovery) and a danger of broadcast flooding in the subnet 24?
Is the performance going to be the same in the 10.1.1.0/24 subnet as it is in the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet if you want to stay in the A class? Actually, it ought to be, given that the number of hosts is constant. You should investigate the operation of these discovery protocols. For instance, if they use the subnet mask as a search parameter or if they examine the first two octets of the subnet to identify class A or class C.
A subnet’s broadcast address is used by some discovery protocols to send a request, which is received by everyone connected. These protocols then wait for responses. It would take much longer to crawl through a larger subnet, test each IP address, and find out which ones are responding for other discoveries, which are more scan-based.
A /16 network may be much slower than a /24 network because you are dealing with the latter type in your environment.
The functional differences between 192.168.1.0/24 and 10.1.1.0/24 are negligible. They ought to act in a similar manner. Due to the widespread use of CIDR, where a larger subnet is frequently divided into smaller ones, modern software shouldn’t ever assume anything about Class A, B, or C based solely on the octets involved.
You are dealing with a piece of software that is incredibly antiquated and has no place in a contemporary network environment if you discover that 192.168.1.0/24 is “faster” than 10.1.1.0/24. The internal ranges you choose won’t matter nearly as much as the size of the subnet mask you employ. What matters is where you divide your IP addresses’ network and client segments, not how many numbers you use (while making sure to not make the subnet mask any smaller on the network side than the allocated ranges will allow for).